Comments for ElizaInHollywood.com -- Life, Hollywood, Entertainment and Politics

Comment on The Long Wait is Over… Ludo Bites is Back by elizainhollywood

elizainhollywood — Tue, 10 Nov 2009 02:39:54 +0000

I wish I had made more reservations. But if any of my dates cancel, I will call you. My reservations are for Dec. 3 & 21 for 8pm. So keep those dates in mind just in case

Comment on The Long Wait is Over… Ludo Bites is Back by TB

TB — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 19:59:43 +0000

Put me on the cancelation list. I would love to join you for dinner again! ((hugs)) to you!!

Comment on The Long Wait is Over… Ludo Bites is Back by The Indomitable Mr. H.

The Indomitable Mr. H. — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 16:42:17 +0000

This makes me very happy. I’m glad that you’ll get to enjoy the Bites once again. I look forward to your review of these subsequent experiences.

Comment on 7 Reasons I’m NOT Calling You Back by elizainhollywood

elizainhollywood — Sun, 08 Nov 2009 03:15:55 +0000

Dear Mr. Hepperle
I’m sorry that a girl didn’t call you back. But perhaps your crude and bitter attitude turned off those women. Good luck to you and your sausage. You’re going to need each other for company.

Comment on And the Nobel Hope Prize Goes To… by Richard

Richard — Sun, 08 Nov 2009 01:35:43 +0000

Dont disagree with you about Obama and the Nobel Peace Prize. But lest you forget, Clinton personally intervened by a phone call to Dennis Hastert minutes before a House vote was to take place on recognition of the Armenian Genocide, to prevent the vote.

It was on Clinton’s watch that the Rwandan Genocide took place – a genocide Clinton knew about and had the power to prevent. He did nothing.

Comment on 7 Reasons I’m NOT Calling You Back by Joe Hepperle

Joe Hepperle — Sat, 07 Nov 2009 20:27:06 +0000

It was really exciting to see your reasons for not calling back. I was disappointed though that you skirted right around one of your bigger reasons. Aren’t you always glancing at the tool box as one of your very first ’scans’. Are you afraid to write openly that which you have talked about numerous times?

Reason # 1.a. You’re a nice guy (or nice looking guy) but you don’t look ‘big’ enough in the codsack.

Even those secret one-off rolls with the ‘big’ guys (you know what I’m talking about– those trysts that you probably won’t ever tell ANYONE about, and you know why…) are screaming evidence of your preference for big suasage. And don’t it just irk you when the guy who looks ‘big’ enough turns out to be a mouth-breather (alluded to in No. 4)?

Of course, as you’ve already pointed out, big power or big money can suspend your big sausage requirement.

But I encourage you to keep following your home-made guidelines for dating. I’m sure you get exactly whom you deserve. The ‘nice’ guys are really not losing anything when you don’t call them back, even if their fantasy is to have a hot chick like you. It is a blow to their self-esteem though, knowing that tons of guys have been up inya but, somehow, they don’t qualify. And rightly so. They will be breeding the next generation and you won’t. That’s how it should be.

Worked hard for all that you’ve accomplished? That’s a hoot! Worked hard like Rita Hayworth I’ll bet.

Comment on And the Nobel Hope Prize Goes To… by elizainhollywood

elizainhollywood — Tue, 13 Oct 2009 07:01:35 +0000

I actually saw the Rachel Maddow commentary and I agree with a lot of it. I give President Obama a lot of credit with how he handled this. I think it came as a big surprise to him, because even he realizes that this was a premature Nobel Peace Prize. Yes, I have high hopes for this American president, but I think the Nobel committee did him a disservice by awarding him the Nobel Prize so early on in his presidency. He is already respected throughout the world, and he has a strong support of a good portion of the constituency. But I just don’t agree with the idea of giving him a Nobel Peace Prize so early on, just because he’s decided to use diplomacy to handle conflict. That’s how it’s supposed to be. Just because the previous president did so much damage to the international reputation of the US, doesn’t mean that the new President should get an award just for doing things differently… or actually how civilized industrialized countries are supposed to handle conflict. With diplomacy first and with arms as a last resort.

I also think it’s interesting that Bill Clinton never got one despite having made so many strides in peace talks in the Middle East, intervention in the Balkans, etc. It just seams like the award had more to do with Obama’s celebrity and persona than anything else.

Comment on And the Nobel Hope Prize Goes To… by PQ

PQ — Mon, 12 Oct 2009 21:23:10 +0000

While I don’t completely disagree with what you are saying, I think this award being given is more of a reflection of how the world viewed the US under Bush. Unseating a political movement seemingly bent on war at any cost was reason enough evidently. While many things are still the same currently, I think this win is predicated on other anticipated events occurring at some point in the future. I do think awards of such supposed magnitude are best given to those who have already accomplished what they have set out to do (of course).

Also – the section in here on the award itself is interesting: http://www.dailykostv.com/w/002235/

Comment on 7 Reasons I’m NOT Calling You Back by elizainhollywood

elizainhollywood — Mon, 12 Oct 2009 04:10:51 +0000

Well I am very impressed with your friend Lisa. I only dated 2 Hanson brothers, but there are only two of them. I had a chance to date multiple McCullough brothers, but I was young and had a 1-brother per household policy. And there were 6 McCullough brothers so I really could have had my share.

Comment on 7 Reasons I’m NOT Calling You Back by matt

matt — Sun, 11 Oct 2009 23:24:46 +0000

i love number 5 because it reminds me of my best friend Lisa who at one time or another managed to date/sleep with all three Turnquist brothers. plus the brother of our best friend amy. to my knowledge, she has not slept with my brother.